As you may know the SCOTUS has officially announced that they will review the case against DC's handgun ban. If any of them have read the constitution and the 2nd amendment in particular there is no way this law does not get struck down. It was illegal when it was passed in 1976 and it is illegal now.  My only real question is why it took so long for this fight to make it this far.

Hopefully we finally have a SCOTUS that has the proper intelligence and guts to finally publicly state what everyone already knows. The 2nd amendment specifically states that individuals have the right to keep and bear arms.

This law also removes a persons ability to move a gun from room to room in their own privately owned house and requires that any firearm ownd has to either be disassembled or have a protective lock on the trigger. So when a person in DC is robbed appearantly they throw the gun at the criminal. This I'm sure is exactly what that particular criminal is hoping for. After all I'm quite certain that the person that is currently illegally entering your home doesn't have his trigger locked or his gun disassembled.

So if as DC says the phrase "right of the people" doesnt pertain to individuals exactly who are the people? The French?

1st. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

    Under that pretext i guess we no longer have the right to individually assemble and protest. So long green peace and code pink. ( Actually we might want to look into that one) j/k


2nd. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. 

    Well we all know what happens here. None of us are allowed to own guns anymore and the first of our rights is gone. 
    " We have come to a place with full gun registration, our streets will be safer our police more effective and the world will follow in our lead" Adolf Hitler - Now he understood the need for a disarmed public.

4th. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized

    Get rid of this one and I guess we no longer need that pesky warrant thing to get in the way of a good prosecution.


9th. The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

    I realize its not the same exact phrase but it conveys the same thought. Each individual cannot be stripped of one right based on the fact of another.

10th. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. 

    Again same as 9 but this one just goes to show how little power the Fed government was intended to have.


Thats all for this time. check in later same bat time same bat channel
CJD